What it means to be powered by Pro Mach

Get a glimpse of the inner workings of the ubiquitous company to find out what’s behind its strategic acquisition model, what they look for in OEMs, and why private equity ownership can be empowering.

Oem 628782 Screen Shot 2016 09 29 At 12 02 14 Pm

No machines are designed or assembled in Pro Mach’s Covington, Ky. headquarters. But that’s not to say that massive structures aren’t being honed, tweaked, rethought, and improved daily in that glass building overlooking metro Cincinnati and the Ohio River. 

What’s under construction isn’t physical, but it’s every bit as real as the packaging and processing machines that Pro Mach’s constituent branded OEMs manufacture and support.

Pro Mach is known for having an eye for acquisitions that they can integrate into their structure. But common knowledge about the company doesn’t always include the hands-off role that corporate plays in its brands’ day-to-day operations. Pro Mach acts as a pit crew or mechanic, while its brands’ keep their hands on the wheel, humming along, and doing what they do best, according to company leadership.

On the late-July afternoon that PP-OEM visited Mark Anderson, CEO, and John Eklund, VP, marketing, at Pro Mach headquarters, work was underway on a common, company-wide customer relationship management (CRM) system implementation. This constitutes heavy lifting, considering Pro Mach’s 28 go-to-market brands, each with differing needs, sophistication levels, incumbent systems, and existing infrastructure.

Fitting with Pro Mach’s management strategy, the details of how to implement a CRM aren’t dictated from on high. And don’t expect to hear grumbles from the brands about having to contort themselves as square pegs to fit into the round holes that corporate gives them. Pro Mach represents a sort of inversion of that stereotypical corporate-to-brand dynamic. Though Pro Mach corporate has its fair share of ideas, for the most part ideas bubble up to corporate from the brands instead of the other way around.

General manager-focused corporate structure
“The organizational structure can best be described as led and driven by the general managers at each of our brands,” Anderson says. “Each one is focused on a particular set of customers and a particular type of equipment that is serving a particular market that has a particular set of competitors.”

Typically, an acquisition’s first general manager will have been the businesses’ founder/owner/president or an operations/engineering/sales lead prior to having been acquired by Pro Mach. He says those general managers know their corner of the space better than anyone. They’ve hand-selected their teams and developed them over the years—and that’s a balance that Anderson is careful not to upset.

“My brother and I started Matrix Packaging in a garage more than 20 years ago and built it into a multimillion-dollar business,” says Marc Willden, general manager of Pro Mach’s Matrix brand. “Having the business we started be acquired by Pro Mach opened new doors for the company and widened my personal horizon much more than I ever anticipated. It was a great step for Matrix and our entire team.”

Anderson echoes Willden in terms of keeping successful structures together. “The people in those organizations want to work for that person. Corporate’s role is to help those general managers get the most advantage possible out of being a part of Pro Mach. Then the people at their organizations know who their boss is. It’s the general manager there in the corner office, right there in their facility. Sales and engineering alike at each brand are able to say, ‘That’s my boss and here’s what we make. That’s our customer, and here’s what we do,’” he says. “It’s crisp, it’s clear, and everybody gets it. We have to retain the high performance teams that are working at the brand level—that’s job number one.”

 

Pro Mach’s corporate office serves as the connective tissue between like-minded general managers in closely related arenas, and acts as a support system for all brands. And Anderson says that’s the way real leaders want to work. The people successful at running Pro Mach brands are people who want to run a business, not work in a matrix organization without the freedom to lead their teams.

“I’m looking for [MLB hall of fame relief pitcher] Mariano Rivera. Someone who will tell me to get off their mound and let them pitch,” Anderson says. “My job is just to get them into a position where they have the resources and support to do their job as well as possible.”

Bret Ranc, president of secondary packaging, agrees. “One of the key attributes of an entrepreneur is that he or she thrives on the challenge of steering an organization towards growth and success,” he says, “Today, I have more responsibility and a larger scope of activities than when I was the general manager of our Shuttleworth brand. And I’m still in the material handling business. I haven’t left the industry I’ve built my career upon.”

Decisions go up the chain, execution comes down
The brands are organized into related business groups, which are headed by senior leaders who report to Anderson. Currently, bottling/capping, primary packaging, pharmaceutical packaging, flexible packaging, material handling, labeling/coding, end of line, and integrated solutions comprise the eight Pro Mach business groups.

“Meanwhile, we’re extremely lean in the corporate office, with only 20 or so people. We don’t have a Pro Mach corporate VP of operations. We don’t have a VP of sales. We don’t have a VP of engineering, and I don’t intend to change that,” Anderson says. “We want those general managers and their teams as close to customers as we can possibly get them. That’s how they grew their business to be attractive enough for us to acquire them in the first place—why would we mess with that?”

With such a decentralized structure, Pro Mach has developed a ground-up way of evolving and sharing ideas. 

“It’s about finding the best practices, highlighting them, and getting consensus and adoption across the brands,” Eklund says. “With so many brands, it’s inevitable that someone’s doing something amazing in pretty much every functional area, whether that’s marketing or sales, engineering or operations. There’s a lot of benefit to just being able to find those instances, shine a light on them, and then share them with the rest of the group.”

The result is a council approach; similar to how PMMI structures its committees. Pro Mach councils include an engineering council, a purchasing council, an aftermarket council, a marketing council, a sales council, and others, each consisting of a group of leaders coming from the respective functional area within the brands. Each of the councils supports a strategic area the company has committed itself to maintain across all brands.

“The engineering council took on the challenge of adopting PackML standards across the brands, no small task,” says Bob Williams, general manager at Pro Mach’s Axon brand. “The give and take, the sharing of best practices, and the practicalities of adoption were all sped up by the council approach. At PACK EXPO every year, I believe Pro Mach leads in the number of machines that are PackML compliant. This would not be the case if each brand tried to greenfield the new processes on their own.”  

In another example, the aforementioned common CRM project was the final verdict of the sales council. At one of their regular sales meetings, the council agreed the time was right to implement a common CRM system for all brands. Now, this isn’t to say that there were many sad faces in Cincinnati when the council reached the conclusion that a shared, common CRM would benefit the whole.

“It’s fair to say corporate planted the seed,” Anderson says. “I can’t say we weren’t trying to steer things in that direction a little bit, but it didn’t happen until the sales leaders got together and said, ‘OK, we’re ready to do this.’ What’s great about it is once we reach a consensus like that, we put our resources into making a world class system and we never stop investing in it. We get it running and then we keep making it better. There are a lot of things that would be easier, from my perspective, if we led more from the top. Standardizing platforms makes things easy from a corporate perspective,” he adds. “But the easy way isn’t necessarily the right way.”

“The conditions were finally right for it to happen,” Eklund adds. “We’re not going to push the change until the conditions are right for the change to happen.”

List: Digitalization Companies From PACK EXPO
Looking for CPG-focused digital transformation solutions? Download our editor-curated list from PACK EXPO featuring top companies offering warehouse management, ERP, digital twin, and MES software with supply chain visibility and analytics capabilities—all tailored specifically for CPG operations.
Download Now
List: Digitalization Companies From PACK EXPO