Can-do attitude toward strategic markets

Find out how BW Container Systems, now with requisite acquisitions cooperating and core markets covered, is preparing to reinvigorate strategic markets and better leverage the larger Barry-Wehmiller packaging platform.

Oem 436974 Screen Shot 2016 05 09 At 11 08 07 Am

As a diversified, acquisition-driven business spanning many brands and divisions, the larger Barry-Wehmiller model has long been creating greater than-the-sum-of-its-parts value for customers. Within the Barry-Wehmiller packaging platform, the evolution of BW Container Systems is an example of the tightrope walk between well-defined corporate strategies and processes, and letting constituent companies do what they’ve always done best.

Confident that a positive, sustainable balance has been struck, Pete Carlson, president, BW Container Systems, senses a new inflection point. Armed with new robotics capabilities and a stronger connection to the larger Barry-Wehmiller packaging platform—Hayssen, Pneumatic Scale Angelus, Synerlink, Thiele, and Accraply—he aims to refocus on strategic markets.

Meanwhile, Mike Jerger, BW Container Systems’ VP of operations, is doing a balancing act of his own. Maintaining efficiency across locations in Romeoville, Ill., Lynchburg, Va., Loveland, Co., and Doncaster, U.K., he is balancing resources and carefully aligning capacity to meet market demands.

Global capacity sharing
Barry-Wehmiller has been growing via acquisition since 1987, and what is now BW Container Systems has done the same since 1999. Jerger, who arrived at BW Container Systems by way of the Fleetwood brand, says the many brands within Container Systems—Fleetwood, Ambec, CBI, Goldco, Wyard, and others—were acquired and pooled with the usual Barry-Wehmiller goal of providing a larger capability to serve the market. But even with great intentions, this model often precipitates isolated, disparate businesses. Each acquisition adds an independent facility with its own history and its own way of doing things. These individual histories are often completely foreign to the other companies that make up the group.

“When you take that structure into the market, you’re left with a reality check. You realize that you’re limited in how you can best serve the market needs,” Jerger says. “We found very quickly that we needed to change the way we operated. We needed the equipment to be able to stretch across boundaries and break those silos. We needed to leverage all of our facilities as seamlessly as we could to serve this market.”

Jerger and his team went about an aggressive plan to accomplish this, developing what he now calls a global capacity sharing capability. First steps included standardization of hardware and software infrastructure so the facilities could share engineering data, processes and outcomes in real time.

A lack of unified infrastructure, left unchecked, can be a killer to multi-location and multi-market OEMs. According to Jerger, it’s difficult to ask a set of disparate facilities to use engineering that originated elsewhere. A rigorous cross-training program was another early priority, so both the tools themselves and the people using them were speaking the same language. The company also standardized its ERP, using an Infor system. This gave it a platform by which otherwise independent warehouse parts and materials inventories could be visible locally, yet be shared across the facilities. The system can also be used for advanced capacity planning.

“We can make a purchase decision in one facility, but we can receive it in a different warehouse where we’re planning on building the machine, all part of a shared capacity mindset,” Jerger says. “Currently, I couldn’t tell you that all of our product lines can be made at all of our facilities. But at least 75 percent of our product lines—from conveyance and palletizing/de-palletizing to custom robotics—can be manufactured in any one of our four facilities at any given time.”

The global capacity sharing model affords BW Container Systems much more flexibility than the incremental business units separately enjoyed. More importantly, customers experience compressed lead times and improved velocity of business.

“We are working on next steps, even with engineering, to take this capacity sharing to another level. The market is looking for quicker and quicker turnarounds for solutions,” Jerger says. “Really, it’s leveraging all of our capacity; and not just the physical capacity, but also the knowledge base. We have to be very quick to market, very flexible, and that ability to do that across multiple facilities has been a huge advantage in our ability to serve those needs.”

In part, this can be practical, as in the case of clearing a work backup in one location by relocating a portion of it to another. But the bigger picture is the market strategy; being able to adapt to a predicted demand. Global capacity sharing gets all facilities pulling in the same direction to shift capacity around in anticipation of a market possibility, and be ready when an order comes in.

Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater
Carlson cops to the fact that there are indeed internal organizational and efficiency advantages to sharing the manufacturing capacity load across facilities, but insists that it isn’t the real impetus. For him, global capacity sharing is just a practical method of keeping up with ever-changing customer needs. Also, it’s a compromise between keeping constituent companies’ individual personalities, and presenting a unified BW Container Systems front.

“Some organizations that are put together through acquisitions tend to maintain their companies’ own unique abilities and characteristics, both physically and in pools of knowledge,” Carlson says. “I would say that what we have built allows those

organizations to maintain their unique identities and keep the things that make them competitive in their market spaces in the first place. But we’ve also established a common approach to our culture and to the tools we use, enabling our teams to feel they are part of a larger team and that they can use things across the enterprise.”

From a sales perspective, the combination of local identity and standardized capabilities allows for a best-of-both-worlds scenario. A buyer requiring vast resources and flexibility, according to Carlson, will see it in BW Container Systems. Or, one of Jerger’s longtime Fleetwood customers will still see the advantages of Fleetwood’s continuity. It just depends on the customer.


Romeoville facility manufacturing and assembly While able to produce just about anything on BW Container Systems’ menu, the Romeoville facility’s primary concentration is to turn over equipment—mostly can and can-end equipment—in assembly tests. Where it makes sense, some machining and fabrication is still done in-house, and there are press brakes, machining and turning centers available. But increasingly, machining and fabrication are being outsourced, a process symbolized by the remaining hulk of an older 2D laser currently being pieced out and sold off, not to be replaced.

“At some point in our history, I noticed I was running a facility with seven CNC mills, and that wasn’t the business we were in,” Jerger says. “Now, we concentrate on designing, building, and testing the machines themselves, not the parts that go in them.”

Currently, north of 80 percent of components are contracted out and delivered complete.

“Our internal fab augments the external, be it specialty items, some stainless and the welds in particular, and the track work that we push can-ends through. That process is extremely particular to clean, precise cuts, small tolerances and welds, so we keep that in-house.”

List: Digitalization Companies From PACK EXPO
Looking for CPG-focused digital transformation solutions? Download our editor-curated list from PACK EXPO featuring top companies offering warehouse management, ERP, digital twin, and MES software with supply chain visibility and analytics capabilities—all tailored specifically for CPG operations.
Download Now
List: Digitalization Companies From PACK EXPO